
DIY investigation feels cheaper. It rarely is.
When facing a situation that calls for investigation, many people attempt to gather evidence themselves before calling a PI. This is understandable, but it frequently creates legal problems, produces inadmissible evidence, and tips off the subject before a professional can document what you need. Here's why the comparison between DIY and professional investigation is not as close as it appears.
Stalking: Following someone in your vehicle, repeatedly driving past their home, or monitoring their movements can constitute stalking under Texas Penal Code §42.072, even if you believe your reasons are justified. A criminal stalking charge will destroy your credibility in any civil proceeding.
Unauthorized account access: Accessing your spouse's, partner's, or employee's phone, email, or social media accounts without their consent is a federal crime under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. §1030) and a Texas state crime under Penal Code §33.02. Evidence obtained this way is inadmissible and exposes you to criminal prosecution.
Even when DIY surveillance is technically legal, evidence gathered by a party to the case is frequently challenged in court. Opposing counsel will argue bias, chain-of-custody problems, and lack of professional documentation standards. A licensed PI's evidence, with timestamped video, professional reports, and established chain of custody, is far more difficult to challenge.
When subjects realize they are being watched, by an amateur, they become more careful. They change their behavior, delete evidence, and warn others. A professional PI conducts surveillance without detection, preserving the element of surprise and the opportunity to document behavior before the subject knows they are being investigated.
Have questions about your situation? Call David Watson for a free confidential consultation.
512-801-9754Speak directly with David Watson. No obligation. 100% confidential.
Call 512-801-9754Send a Message